The Premier League’s U-turn on the extremely controversial pay-per-view broadcast mannequin is proof that fans nonetheless have a highly effective voice within the fashionable game, regardless of many supporters feeling as they have more and more grow to be a money cow for grasping executives.
Pay-per-view Premier League games had been introduced in last month as a poorly judged method of attempting to return to a more regular broadcast schedule regardless that stadiums stay closed to fans.
It was billed that the games not in any other case be chosen for live broadcast within the UK could be proven on Sky Sports Box Office or BT Sport Box Office, platforms which might be often the area of main boxing or wrestling events. The networks would take a lower of the proceeds to cowl prices, but any revenue was supposed to go to clubs as a method of softening the blow of non-existent matchday income.
Whatever the intentions, the £14.95 price tag for one-off games was a stunning PR own goal.
Fans, many of whom already pay for costly subscription packages, had been outraged and felt fleeced for even more cash. There had been discussions on social media that a cheaper price point would possibly have been simpler to swallow, but asking the best half of £15 took the proverbial biscuit.
Sky Sports pundit Gary Neville referred to as for it to be scrapped and even Newcastle proprietor Mike Ashley made uncommon public feedback labelling the price as ‘not acceptable’.
It is said that even Sky and BT had been eager to distance themselves from pay-per-view games, fearing the damage it was doing to their respective reputations. The Premier League was responsible for setting the price and the broadcasters have not been profiting, but it was nonetheless extensively perceived, wrongly, as an act of greed and a cash seize on their half.
A Premier League assembly on Thursday yielded a welcome settlement to scrap pay-per-view.
Five fixtures this weekend will nonetheless be broadcast with the £14.95 price tag, but they would be the last group of games which might be and a report from The Times explains that clubs have requested the Premier League to come up different choices over the November international break.
The probably situation is predicted to be a return to how issues had been throughout ‘Project Restart’ and within the opening weeks of the season the place all games had been proven live at no extra cost to present subscription packages, which incorporates these made obtainable for free on BBC and Amazon Prime.
Cheaper price points of £9.95 or £7.50 per game are said to have been thought-about at Thursday’s assembly, but it’s said clubs thought-about it so damaging already it’s best to scrap it altogether.
Flat out refusing to pay £14.95, fans of a number of Premier League clubs have actively boycotted the pay-per-view games in recent weeks and as a substitute donated cash to charities and food banks. It is estimated that round £300,000 has been raised on this method.
That Premier League sides have seen the response and altered technique accordingly is a refreshing reminder that fans do nonetheless matter and have a voice to hold clubs to account.
The Daily Mirror has recommended that pay-per-view does stay on the table, nonetheless, and could also be revisited sooner or later because a handful of games did entice ‘good figures’. That could possibly be a worrying development if it does come back, but it will silly or brazen people who try and resurrect it when the response was so resoundingly adverse first time round.
For more from Jamie Spencer, follow him on Twitter and Facebook!